Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

A True Pioneer In The Fight For Disability Rights

In an interview, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (RBG) stated

RIP Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Photo Cred: Gayatri Malhotra on Unsplash

that she wished to be remembered as someone who “repaired tears in her society, who made things a little better through the use of whatever ability she has.”

Justice Ginsburg’s work certainly mended the tears in many lives.  She is widely and appropriately celebrated for advancing the movement for gender equality.  We should also remember and celebrate that she played a very important role in advancing the rights of people with disabilities.

Mental Illness As A Disability

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg authored the opinion in Olmstead v. L.C. (1999) which acknowledged mental illness as a disability for the first time, classifying mental illness as a condition covered under the Americans With Disabilities Act.

In that case, two women with mental illness and developmental disabilities were kept confined to an institution for several years after completing necessary treatment.  The women sued the State, arguing that the hospital was in violation of the American’s With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) which protects “qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the basis of disability in obtaining services, programs and activities provided by government entities.”

The State argued that it was funding difficulties and not discrimination that kept them from moving the women into an appropriate and less restrictive program.  Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court which sided with the plaintiffs and which states that the ADA requires States to provide community based treatment for persons with mental disabilities if that treatment is appropriate, not opposed by the patient and can be reasonably accommodated.

This opinion directly connected discrimination against people with disabilities to racial and gender discrimination and pointed out that anti-discrimination laws need to be broadly interpreted to address many types of segregation and harm, even if they are not mentioned in the original legislation.

By utilizing the ADA to end the “unjustified segregation” of people with mental disabilities, Justice Ginsburg and the United States Supreme Court upheld the value of integrating individuals with mental impairments into general society and enriching their access to family relations, social contacts, work options, economic independence, educational advancement and cultural enrichment.

Table of Contents

  • Contact us today for a free evaluation.

    We have licensed attorneys to represent clients in Utah, Nevada, Idaho, Arizona, California and Washington.
    Contact Us

  • Marva Match Disability Law

    455 East 200 South Suite 100
    Salt Lake City, UT 84111

    Email: info@matchdisabilitylaw.com
    Phone: 801-532-4556
    Toll Free: 855-532-4556

  • Hours of Operation

    Monday through Friday
    9:00 am – 5:00 pm

    Saturday & Sunday
    Closed

  • Excellent rating
    Based on 57 reviews
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5.0.6
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Marva is exactly who you need to fight for your benefits. She is direct and a straight shooter. The staff at match is amazing. They're kind, caring and patient. I highly recommend Match Disability. Thank you all for everything.
    Dale Ponnell profile picture
    Dale Ponnell
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Trying to navigate Social Security on my own seemed futile. It can be a long arduous process. My experience with Marva Match and her team was nothing short of outstanding! There were a lot of complexities involved with my case and they didn’t give up. I’m extremely grateful to Marva for advocating on my behalf. I highly recommend Match Disability Law to anyone going through this process.
    jackie gerosin profile picture
    jackie gerosin
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    My attorney at Match Disability approached my case with compassion. She showed genuine concern for me and my family. In the end she pushed my claim through and it was approved in about six weeks. This will not be the same scenario for many claimant's unfortunately, but my story is proof of the genuine care these attorneys have for their clients. Contacting Match Disability is one of the best decisions I've made.
    Cary Schwanitz profile picture
    Cary Schwanitz
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    My case was taken by Match Disability Law the intake process took an hour, they had already filed my case with Social Security, the paralegals are friendly and answered all my questions
    Yolanda Herrera profile picture
    Yolanda Herrera
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    We have hired Match Disability Law on two different occasions for two separate cases. Both times all of the staff were very helpful and courteous to us as we navigated the difficult Social Security Disability appeals process. I know that it is because of their caring dedication to their clients that both of our cases were approved. Marva and her staff do an excellent job at representing their clients. We recommend them to anyone looking for help after receiving a denial for SS disability benefits. I would give more stars if I could. We are forever grateful for their firm.
    Celeste Johnson profile picture
    Celeste Johnson
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Really fought for me! Great staff 10/10 really recommend
    Kira Walker profile picture
    Kira Walker
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    These guys were quite for you, they've been on my side for years. I've been denied and denied and denied and denied. And finally, we have won my Battle.
    Nicole Kichelmann profile picture
    Nicole Kichelmann
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    I had a disappointing experience with Ms. Match. At the commencement of our experience together I had some conversations with some of her staff. They were professional, and courteous. However, when it came time for the hearing I had two or three phone conversations with Ms. Match in which she was short, rude and condescending - not what I would expect from a professional who has chosen to work with those in very desperate and vulnerable situations. My claim was ultimately denied following the hearing and I had received very little counsel in the nearly twenty or so months it took from applying to the hearing. I feel as though if I had received better counsel I could have won my case as my medical history clearly demonstrates a serious medical issue. I have given two stars instead of one because my dealings with her staff were positive.
    Matt Hughes profile picture
    Matt Hughes