THE HISTORY OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND THEIR METHOD OF ANALYZING CLAIMS 

A social security card as background with text "A History Lesson and How Claims Are Analyzed"

The Origins of Social Security and How the SSA Administers Disability Claims

Social Security plays a central role in providing retirement, survivor, and disability benefits to millions of Americans—but many people don’t understand how Social Security disability claims are analyzed or why claims are often denied. The Social Security Administration (SSA) is an administrative agency within the Executive Branch of the federal government, and it follows a detailed legal framework created by Congress to evaluate benefit claims. Understanding the history of Social Security and the rules the agency uses to analyze disability claims can help claimants better navigate the system and protect their rights.

On August 14, 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law. This landmark legislation created a federally administered system of social insurance for older Americans, funded through payroll taxes paid by workers and their employers. The Act also established the Social Security Board, which later evolved into the Social Security Administration (SSA).

In August 1956, Congress expanded the program to include benefits for individuals with disabilities, laying the foundation for today’s Social Security Disability system.

How Social Security Is Governed

Social Security operates under laws passed by Congress, which has the authority to create federal programs and delegate responsibilities to administrative agencies.

  • Congressional laws are codified in the United States Code.
  • Federal agencies, including SSA, then create rules and regulations to implement those laws.
  • These regulations are published in the Federal Register and compiled in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

Although these regulations are not statutes passed by Congress, they carry the force of law and can include penalties for noncompliance.

The Regulations That Control Disability Claims

The rules governing Social Security benefits appear primarily in Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These regulations explain:

  • Eligibility standards for retirement benefits
  • Rules for survivor benefits
  • The legal framework used to evaluate disability claims

This regulatory structure is what allows SSA to apply the law consistently across millions of claims each year.

Types of Disability Benefits: SSDI and SSI

The regulations define two distinct disability programs:

Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI – Title II)

SSDI is based on a worker’s earnings record and payment of FICA taxes. Key features include:

  • Benefit amounts depend on prior earnings and family size
  • Not all income is subject to FICA taxes
  • In 2025, FICA taxes apply only to the first $168,000 of earned income
  • Generally, a person must have worked and paid FICA taxes for 5 of the last 10 years before becoming disabled
  • The earnings requirement is relatively modest (currently just under $7,000 per year, adjusted annually for inflation)

👉 Recommended Reading:  Who Doesn’t Pay Into Social Security (And What That Means for Them)

Supplemental Security Income (SSI – Title XVI)

SSI is a needs-based entitlement program for individuals who do not qualify for SSDI and have limited income and resources.

  • Asset limits are similar to programs like Medicaid or SNAP
  • Generally, countable assets must be under:
    • $2,000 for an individual
    • $3,000 for a couple

SSI is not based on work history, but strict financial rules apply.

👉 Recommended Reading:   Why People Lose Their Social Security Benefits (and How to Avoid It!)

How Social Security Defines Disability

Once SSA determines that a person is insured for SSDI or financially eligible for SSI, the agency evaluates medical eligibility.

Under federal regulations, disability is defined as:

The inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity (SGA) due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairment that has lasted, or is expected to last, at least 12 continuous months or result in death.

The Five-Step Disability Evaluation Process

Social Security uses a five-step sequential evaluation process to analyze every disability claim:

  1. Are you working above the SGA level?
    (In 2024, SGA is $1,550 per month for non-blind individuals.)
  2. Do you have a severe impairment?
  3. Does your condition meet or equal a listed impairment?
  4. Can you perform your past relevant work?
  5. Is there other work in the national economy you could perform?

If the answer at any step results in a finding of “not disabled,” the claim is denied.

👉 Recommended Reading:   How Does the SSA Determine Disability 

👉 Recommended Reading:   What Really Happens at Your Disability Hearing with an Administrative Law Judge

Who Makes Social Security Disability Decisions?

While Social Security oversees the program, initial disability determinations are made by state agencies acting on SSA’s behalf.

These agencies:

  • Collect medical records
  • Evaluate functional limitations
  • Determine whether a claimant can sustain work activity

If SSA determines that no work can be sustained, benefits are awarded. If SSA finds that some work exists in the national economy, the claim is denied.

👉 Recommended Reading: timelines and tips for processing a social security disability application

Appeals and Administrative Law Judges

A denied claim can be appealed:

  1. Reconsideration by the agency
  2. Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)

An ALJ hearing is non-adversarial:

  • There is no opposing attorney representing Social Security
  • The judge’s role is to gather facts and apply the law objectively

If a claim is denied by an ALJ, a claimant may seek further review by filing a case in U.S. District Court.

Why Legal Representation for Your Social Security Claim Matters

The Social Security disability system is complex, highly regulated, and evidence-driven. An experienced disability attorney can:

  • Identify weaknesses in the agency’s analysis
  • Ensure medical evidence is properly developed
  • Present your case clearly at a hearing

Having knowledgeable guidance can make a meaningful difference at every stage of the process.

Recommended External References (Authoritative Sources)

These sources provide excellent historical and legal context and are well-suited for outbound links:

Table of Contents

  • Contact us today for a free evaluation.

    We have licensed attorneys to represent clients in Utah, Nevada, Idaho, Arizona, California and Washington.
    Contact Us

  • Marva Match Disability Law

    455 East 200 South Suite 100
    Salt Lake City, UT 84111

    Email: info@matchdisabilitylaw.com
    Phone: 801-532-4556
    Toll Free: 855-532-4556

  • Hours of Operation

    Monday through Friday
    9:00 am – 5:00 pm

    Saturday & Sunday
    Closed

  • Excellent rating
    Based on 57 reviews
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5.0.6
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Marva is exactly who you need to fight for your benefits. She is direct and a straight shooter. The staff at match is amazing. They're kind, caring and patient. I highly recommend Match Disability. Thank you all for everything.
    Dale Ponnell profile picture
    Dale Ponnell
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Trying to navigate Social Security on my own seemed futile. It can be a long arduous process. My experience with Marva Match and her team was nothing short of outstanding! There were a lot of complexities involved with my case and they didn’t give up. I’m extremely grateful to Marva for advocating on my behalf. I highly recommend Match Disability Law to anyone going through this process.
    jackie gerosin profile picture
    jackie gerosin
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    My attorney at Match Disability approached my case with compassion. She showed genuine concern for me and my family. In the end she pushed my claim through and it was approved in about six weeks. This will not be the same scenario for many claimant's unfortunately, but my story is proof of the genuine care these attorneys have for their clients. Contacting Match Disability is one of the best decisions I've made.
    Cary Schwanitz profile picture
    Cary Schwanitz
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    My case was taken by Match Disability Law the intake process took an hour, they had already filed my case with Social Security, the paralegals are friendly and answered all my questions
    Yolanda Herrera profile picture
    Yolanda Herrera
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    We have hired Match Disability Law on two different occasions for two separate cases. Both times all of the staff were very helpful and courteous to us as we navigated the difficult Social Security Disability appeals process. I know that it is because of their caring dedication to their clients that both of our cases were approved. Marva and her staff do an excellent job at representing their clients. We recommend them to anyone looking for help after receiving a denial for SS disability benefits. I would give more stars if I could. We are forever grateful for their firm.
    Celeste Johnson profile picture
    Celeste Johnson
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Really fought for me! Great staff 10/10 really recommend
    Kira Walker profile picture
    Kira Walker
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    These guys were quite for you, they've been on my side for years. I've been denied and denied and denied and denied. And finally, we have won my Battle.
    Nicole Kichelmann profile picture
    Nicole Kichelmann
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    I had a disappointing experience with Ms. Match. At the commencement of our experience together I had some conversations with some of her staff. They were professional, and courteous. However, when it came time for the hearing I had two or three phone conversations with Ms. Match in which she was short, rude and condescending - not what I would expect from a professional who has chosen to work with those in very desperate and vulnerable situations. My claim was ultimately denied following the hearing and I had received very little counsel in the nearly twenty or so months it took from applying to the hearing. I feel as though if I had received better counsel I could have won my case as my medical history clearly demonstrates a serious medical issue. I have given two stars instead of one because my dealings with her staff were positive.
    Matt Hughes profile picture
    Matt Hughes