How the Social Security Administration analyzes seizures

Photo cred: Epilepsy Foundation of Mississippi

How you can qualify for disability benefits based on epilepsy or seizure disorders?

It’s National Epilepsy Awareness Month, and we wanted to let you know how the Social Security Administration analyzes seizures when determining if someone who has them meets SSA disability criteria.

Seizure events themselves are rather complicated, and how they are defined by medical providers also varies. Understanding how the SSA looks at and categorizes them will help individuals with seizures..

As with all impairments, Social Security’s general rule for claims is that the seizures must prevent you from working on a full-time basis.

Social Security first considers the type of seizure, dividing them into two distinct types:

In other words, the types of seizures are those in which a person:

  • Loses consciousness, falls to the ground, and involuntarily shakes
  • Does not lose full consciousness or fall to the ground, but experiences a sort of freeze in thinking or time they cannot account for

Other terms for these are grand mal seizures and petit mal seizures, respectively.

 

For an individual to qualify for benefits, the next thing Social Security looks at is the frequency of seizures:

  • Generalized (grand mal): an average of one seizure per month, for at least three consecutive months
  • Dyscognitive (petit mal): an average of one seizure per week for at least three consecutive months

For both types, the seizures must occur at these rates even when individuals are taking medications exactly as their physician prescribed.

 

How can you qualify for disability benefits even if your seizures don’t occur at the SSA’s required average rates?

Even without monthly grand mal seizures or weekly petit mal seizures over three months, some can still qualify for disability benefits if the impact of their seizures prevents full-time work.

For example, a person may have four to five grand mal seizures per year and provide documentation showing they need multiple days to recover after each seizure. These seizures alone, if spread out evenly over a year, would be insufficient for an SSA claim.

However, if the individual can show that the aftermath causes severe, long-lasting cognitive confusion or significant fatigue (which is common), then a judge can still award the claim, finding the individual would miss too much work to remain competitively employed.

 

What will keep you from winning your claim even if you have frequent seizures?

One of the most important things to remember here is that Social Security looks at the number and impact of seizures with the use of prescribed medication. A full assessment is found only after Social Security determines that seizure medications are being taken as prescribed by a physician.

Judges make this conclusion based on reports of compliance and prescribed medication levels in blood labs. The main thing that will prevent you from winning a claim based on seizures is non-compliance with medical treatment.

The thing we see most in denied seizure claims is individuals who:

  • don’t take their daily prescribed medication
  • stop taking it because they feel fine
  • aren’t willing to try a new medication prescribed by a doctor

While there are probably seemingly good reasons for not taking a medication sometimes—some people report side effects that outweigh the benefits—in a seizure case, compliance with prescribed medication is absolutely necessary.

Many Social Security judges feel seizures are an entirely controllable impairment, if the right dose or combination of medication is found. Finding the treatment can take years for many people, and those who get treatment and work with doctors to try to control seizures are those who judges find sympathetic.

It’s important for individuals to work closely with their doctors toward controlling the amount and intensity of seizures. This includes taking prescribed medications at the right times and not using alcohol or other, illegal substances, since these may be the primary cause of seizures. Refraining from using these substances is also vital to winning your claim.

 

Sources:

Table of Contents

  • Contact us today for a free evaluation.

    We have licensed attorneys to represent clients in Utah, Nevada, Idaho, Arizona, California and Washington.
    Contact Us

  • Marva Match Disability Law

    455 East 200 South Suite 100
    Salt Lake City, UT 84111

    Email: info@matchdisabilitylaw.com
    Phone: 801-532-4556
    Toll Free: 855-532-4556

  • Hours of Operation

    Monday through Friday
    9:00 am – 5:00 pm

    Saturday & Sunday
    Closed

  • Excellent rating
    Based on 57 reviews
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5.0.6
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Marva is exactly who you need to fight for your benefits. She is direct and a straight shooter. The staff at match is amazing. They're kind, caring and patient. I highly recommend Match Disability. Thank you all for everything.
    Dale Ponnell profile picture
    Dale Ponnell
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Trying to navigate Social Security on my own seemed futile. It can be a long arduous process. My experience with Marva Match and her team was nothing short of outstanding! There were a lot of complexities involved with my case and they didn’t give up. I’m extremely grateful to Marva for advocating on my behalf. I highly recommend Match Disability Law to anyone going through this process.
    jackie gerosin profile picture
    jackie gerosin
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    My attorney at Match Disability approached my case with compassion. She showed genuine concern for me and my family. In the end she pushed my claim through and it was approved in about six weeks. This will not be the same scenario for many claimant's unfortunately, but my story is proof of the genuine care these attorneys have for their clients. Contacting Match Disability is one of the best decisions I've made.
    Cary Schwanitz profile picture
    Cary Schwanitz
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    My case was taken by Match Disability Law the intake process took an hour, they had already filed my case with Social Security, the paralegals are friendly and answered all my questions
    Yolanda Herrera profile picture
    Yolanda Herrera
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    We have hired Match Disability Law on two different occasions for two separate cases. Both times all of the staff were very helpful and courteous to us as we navigated the difficult Social Security Disability appeals process. I know that it is because of their caring dedication to their clients that both of our cases were approved. Marva and her staff do an excellent job at representing their clients. We recommend them to anyone looking for help after receiving a denial for SS disability benefits. I would give more stars if I could. We are forever grateful for their firm.
    Celeste Johnson profile picture
    Celeste Johnson
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Really fought for me! Great staff 10/10 really recommend
    Kira Walker profile picture
    Kira Walker
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    These guys were quite for you, they've been on my side for years. I've been denied and denied and denied and denied. And finally, we have won my Battle.
    Nicole Kichelmann profile picture
    Nicole Kichelmann
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    I had a disappointing experience with Ms. Match. At the commencement of our experience together I had some conversations with some of her staff. They were professional, and courteous. However, when it came time for the hearing I had two or three phone conversations with Ms. Match in which she was short, rude and condescending - not what I would expect from a professional who has chosen to work with those in very desperate and vulnerable situations. My claim was ultimately denied following the hearing and I had received very little counsel in the nearly twenty or so months it took from applying to the hearing. I feel as though if I had received better counsel I could have won my case as my medical history clearly demonstrates a serious medical issue. I have given two stars instead of one because my dealings with her staff were positive.
    Matt Hughes profile picture
    Matt Hughes